Facebook Censorship strikes again - smAsho mAsh banned.

Post Reply
Message
Author
anomalous howard
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:40 pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 124 times

Facebook Censorship strikes again - smAsho mAsh banned.

#1 Post by anomalous howard » Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:05 pm

smAsho mAsh covers solar activity daily on youtube. Videos are then shared among various GSM/Global Cooling prepper groups. For the crime of sharing their videos on fb, they have been banned.
The following site is an uncensored repository for their library: https://www.minds.com/smashomash



A sample of their fact-based work:


Christian, maybe a mention of this in a future video n your coverage of this subject?
I'm sure smAsho mAsh would appreciate it. They are quite aware of your good work.
thx.

User avatar
Andy F
Posts: 1961
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:07 pm
Has thanked: 498 times
Been thanked: 556 times

Re: Facebook Censorship strikes again - smAsho mAsh banned.

#2 Post by Andy F » Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:08 pm

anomalous howard wrote:
Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:05 pm
smAsho mAsh covers solar activity daily on youtube. Videos are then shared among various GSM/Global Cooling prepper groups. For the crime of sharing their videos on fb, they have been banned.
The following site is an uncensored repository for their library: https://www.minds.com/smashomash

Christian, maybe a mention of this in a future video n your coverage of this subject?
I'm sure smAsho mAsh would appreciate it. They are quite aware of your good work.
thx.

NASA Whistleblower Exposes Huge Climate Model Gaffes
Published on January 4, 2019

https://principia-scientific.org/nasa- ... el-gaffes/
The gaping flaw, says Thresher is that usually only one person, the IT incompetent scientist who programmed it, knows what’s in the program.

He reveals what the actual custom and practice has long been among NASA climate experts:

“A large program like a climate model may be written by many IT incompetent scientists, but each of these usually only programs part of it — one or a few subroutines — and by themselves. Having never been double-checked, the programs are almost certainly full of bugs and their results are questionable.”

To illustrate his point Dr Thresher refers to the recent article in Nature, BBC ocean warming supposedly further proving global warming, which had to be retracted.

A ‘climate denier’ – a qualified mathematician spotted the error while casually reading Nature. The BBC, a global mouthpiece of climate propaganda, quietly and deceptively covered up the error.

The ‘denier’ mathematician who exposed the calamity identified that it was in the programming. The program was written by just one (IT incompetent) author of the article.

Thresher notes:

“It was almost certainly full of bugs since it was never peer reviewed. You would expect that articles in Nature were peer reviewed up the yin-yang – so would have no errors, so would never need to be retracted.”

Thankfully, the world is waking up to the farce that is called government climate ‘science.’
"Conspiracy Theorist: One who asks legitimate questions about shady activities of people who're well known to be liars." https://www.archive.org :mrgreen: http://www.secretsinplainsight.com/

anomalous howard
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:40 pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 124 times

Re: Facebook Censorship strikes again - smAsho mAsh banned.

#3 Post by anomalous howard » Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:30 pm

On "long-term" planetary average temperatures - ie baseline temperatures - with particular stress on long term average.
Shorter term variations deviating from average thus come from albedo effects (clouds/ice-snowcover-atmospheric particle reflectivity) and solar insolation....not greenhouse gas effects.

Zeller-Nikolov's basic findings: Only two variables dictate a planet's long-term avg temp. Atmospheric pressure and distance from the Sun. That's it...just two.

"The Zeller-Nikolov climate discovery may turn the world upside down."

https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Z ... 8-572.html

"Despite multiple technical reviews by scientists around the world, no one has found error in Zeller and Nikolov's mathematical formulas and specific computations."

"Zeller and Nikolov have found that the gaseous composition of atmospheres is immaterial to determining long-term average temperatures. For example, the atmosphere of Venus is composed of 96.5% carbon dioxide, while Earth's atmosphere contains only .04% carbon dioxide, yet those vast differences are irrelevant to the mathematical calculations required to determine average temperatures. This mathematical proof tells us that even though Venus has 2,412 times more carbon dioxide than Earth measured as a percentage of its atmosphere, that CO2 has no measurable effects on its average long-term temperature. Zeller and Nikolov claim that carbon dioxide and all the other atmospheric gases only contribute to temperature by their physical mass and resultant atmospheric pressure. They point out that their predictions for planets and moons are accurate to within one degree Celsius, a confidence-inspiring finding so precise that coincidence can reasonably be ruled out."

"For example, the atmosphere of Venus is composed of 96.5% carbon dioxide, while Earth's atmosphere contains only .04% carbon dioxide, yet those vast differences are irrelevant to the mathematical calculations required to determine average temperatures."

Post Reply